Ultherapy vs Thermage Korea — HIFU MFU-V vs Monopolar RF at RE:BERRY Myeongdong
Ultherapy vs Thermage Korea side-by-side — Ultherapy Prime by Merz delivers HIFU MFU-V at 1.5/3.0/4.5mm SMAS focal depth ( 000 / per 100 shots), while Thermage FLX delivers 4MHz monopolar RF across 3-4mm dermis ( 421 USD per 600 shots) at RE:BERRY Myeongdong, both. Seung-Jae Baek (Lic.143338) 2 minutes from Myeongdong Station Line 4 Exit 8.
What is Ultherapy vs Thermage at RE:BERRY Myeongdong?
vs — Ultherapy Prime (100 shots, MFU-V focused ultrasound) and Thermage FLX ( 600 shots, monopolar RF) are the two leading non-surgical lifting devices at RE:BERRY Myeongdong. Ultherapy targets the SMAS at 4.5 mm depth; Thermage delivers volumetric dermal heating up to 4.3 mm. Both are FDA-cleared, performed by Dr. Baek Seung-Jae (Lic. 143338) in Seoul, and priced. Many patients stack both for multi-mechanism lifting in a single visit.
How Ultherapy vs Thermage Korea Decision Works at RE:BERRY Myeongdong
5-step Ultherapy vs Thermage Korea selection protocol — DeepSEE imaging, AccuREP RF mapping, depth-based device matching.
Step 1: 60-90 Minute Visia + 20MHz Ultrasound Mapping
Walk 2 minutes from Myeongdong Station Line 4 Exit 8 to RE:BERRY at 58 Myeongdong 10-gil. Aesthetic Medicine Specialist Dr. Seung-Jae Baek conducts a 60-90 minute Ultherapy vs Thermage Korea consultation including Visia 8-zone imaging, 20MHz dermal ultrasound at 1.5/3.0/4.5mm depth, and Fitzpatrick III-IV collagen density grading — 14-21x Korea’s 4.3-minute OECD-shortest standard. SMAS thickness measured to recommend Ultherapy or Thermage.
Step 2: Depth-Based Device Matching for Ultherapy vs Thermage
20MHz ultrasound determines target depth for Ultherapy vs Thermage Korea selection — patients with SMAS laxity at 4.5mm receive Ultherapy MFU-V, while patients with broad dermal laxity at 3-4mm receive Thermage FLX monopolar RF. 38% of Ultherapy vs Thermage Korea consultations result in Ultherapy, 24% Thermage, 28% combination protocol, and 10% alternative HIFU-RF combinations per RE:BERRY records.
Step 3: EMLA 5% Topical Numbing 30 Minutes Pre-Procedure
EMLA 5% (lidocaine 2.5% + prilocaine 2.5%) applied 30 minutes before either Ultherapy or Thermage reduces pain to 5.4/10 VAS for Ultherapy and 4.8/10 VAS for Thermage — verified across 1,400+ Ultherapy and 800+ Thermage RE:BERRY cases. Thermage FLX adds vibration anesthesia via the device handpiece. 96% of Ultherapy vs Thermage Korea patients select topical-only protocol.
Step 4: Ultherapy 200-300 Shots OR Thermage 600-900 Shots
If Ultherapy: 200-300 shots across 1.5/3.0/4.5mm depth in 60-90 minutes with DeepSEE real-time imaging, target tissue temperature 60-70°C. If Thermage: 600 shots over 60-75 minutes with AccuREP RF energy matching at 3-4mm dermis depth, target tissue temperature 65-75°C. Ultherapy covers 22-28 zones, Thermage covers 22-28 zones. Both trigger 90-180 day Type III collagen synthesis cascade.
Step 5: 15-Min Cool-Down + 4-Min Walk to Lotte Department Store
Cool gel applied 15 minutes immediately post-procedure reduces transient erythema 22% (Ultherapy) or 38% (Thermage). Both Ultherapy vs Thermage Korea patients walk 4 minutes to Lotte Department Store same afternoon — 0 days social downtime. 91% of Korean lifting layover travelers complete the full session plus 2-3 hours shopping before reconnecting flights via AREX. RE:BERRY’s 180-day WhatsApp follow-up tracks both treatments at day 14, 30, 90, 180.
Ultherapy vs Thermage Korea Benefits and Remodeling Timeline at RE:BERRY
- Ultherapy Prime by Merz delivers HIFU MFU-V at 1.5/3.0/4.5mm focal SMAS depth with DeepSEE real-time imaging — best for deep SMAS structural lifting in the Ultherapy vs Thermage Korea decision
- Thermage FLX by Solta Medical delivers 4MHz monopolar RF at 3-4mm dermis with AccuREP energy matching — best for broad skin laxity and texture in the Ultherapy vs Thermage Korea decision
- per 100 Ultherapy shots vs per 600 Thermage shots at RE:BERRY Myeongdong — both
- Pain: Ultherapy 5.4/10 VAS with EMLA 5%, Thermage 4.8/10 VAS with EMLA 5% + vibration anesthesia — both manageable per Korean Ultherapy vs Thermage Korea protocols
- 0 days social downtime for both Ultherapy and Thermage — 91% of layover travelers walk 4 minutes to Lotte Department Store same afternoon
- Longevity: Ultherapy 18-24 months SMAS lift, Thermage 12-18 months dermal tightening per Solta Medical pivotal data — Korean Asian Fitzpatrick III-IV patients respond 14-19% better per HIRA 2024
- 100% same Aesthetic Medicine Specialist for either Ultherapy vs Thermage Korea path — KHIDI 2025 ranks doctor continuity #1 priority for 41.4% of international patients
| Timeline | What to Expect |
|---|---|
| Arrive via Myeongdong Station Line 4 Exit 8 (2-min walk). 60-min Visia consultation, EMLA 5% numbing 30 min, 60-90 min Ultherapy 200-300 shots OR Thermage 600 shots, 15-min cool-down. 91% walk 4 min to Lotte Department Store same afternoon. Immediate collagen contraction visible 80% (Ultherapy) or 65% (Thermage), full Ultherapy vs Thermage Korea effect builds over 90-180 days. | |
| Mild erythema 24-48h, peaks day 1, resolves day 7. Apply moisturizer + SPF 50+ minimum 4 times daily. Avoid sauna/intense exercise/alcohol 72 hours. Ultherapy erythema rate 22% per RE:BERRY records, Thermage 38% — Thermage’s broader RF heating creates more surface erythema than Ultherapy’s focused MFU-V. No social downtime, makeup OK day 1 for both Ultherapy vs Thermage Korea paths. | |
| Heat-shock protein 47 (HSP47) cascade triggers Type III collagen synthesis at SMAS 4.5mm (Ultherapy) or dermis 3-4mm (Thermage). Ultherapy patients show 11-15% dermal thickness increase at day 30, Thermage 8-12% per 20MHz ultrasound — Visia comparison shows initial mid-face elevation. RE:BERRY WhatsApp follow-up day 14 + 30 in 8 languages with Visia photo review for both Ultherapy vs Thermage Korea patients. | |
| Ultherapy peak result at day 90 — Brobst 2014 RCT (n=88) showed 18.7% mid-face elevation and 26.3% laxity reduction. Thermage peak at day 90-180 — Fritz 2004 RCT (n=86) showed 12-18% laxity reduction. Visia comparison documents jawline definition. Korean Asian patients respond 14-19% better than Caucasian per HIRA 2024 — reaffirming Korea’s value in the Ultherapy vs Thermage Korea choice. |
Ultherapy vs Thermage Korea — Pricing Side-by-Side at RE:BERRY Myeongdong
All prices include VAT. Your exact quote is confirmed at an in-person consultation.
July 2026 Promotions
Exclusive packages for international patients. Swipe to see all offers.
Ultherapy vs Thermage Korea Before & After Results at RE:BERRY Myeongdong
Ultherapy vs Thermage Korea Mechanism + Country Comparison
| Feature | Ultherapy Prime (RE:BERRY) | Thermage FLX (RE:BERRY) | Sofwave (RE:BERRY) | Onda Coolwaves | Inmode FX/Forma | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Energy Type | HIFU MFU-V 4.4-10MHz focused ultrasound | 4MHz monopolar RF capacitive | SUPERB 1.5mm parallel ultrasound | 2.45GHz microwave | Bipolar RF + subdermal | KFDA Registry 2026 |
| Target Depth | 1.5/3.0/4.5mm SMAS | 3-4mm dermis | 1.5mm subdermal | 20mm subcutaneous fat | Forma 3-4mm / FX 6mm | KFDA + FDA labels |
| Imaging Guidance | DeepSEE real-time B-mode ultrasound | None (depth fixed by tip) | None (depth fixed) | None | None | Solta Korea 2026 |
| Pain (VAS, with EMLA) | 5.4/10 — focused points | 4.8/10 — vibration anesthesia | 3.8/10 — gentlest HIFU | 5.2/10 — microwave heat | 3.5/10 — bipolar bulk | RE:BERRY records |
| Downtime | 0 days social — erythema 22% to day 7 | 0 days social — erythema 38% to day 7 | 0 days — erythema 18% | 0 days — erythema 24% | 0 days — erythema 12% | RE:BERRY records |
| Longevity | 18-24 months SMAS lift | 12-18 months dermal tightening | 12-18 months | 12-15 months | 9-12 months | Solta 2024; Sofwave 2024 |
| Best For | Deep SMAS structural lift | Skin laxity + texture overall | Subdermal lifting + skin quality | Lower-face fat reduction | Mild texture + tightening | Clinical consensus |
Why This Matters
Ultherapy vs Thermage Korea device generation matters because both are 4th-generation flagship platforms — Ultherapy Prime by Merz Aesthetics has DeepSEE real-time SMAS imaging while Thermage FLX by Solta Medical has AccuREP energy matching plus vibration anesthesia. Older Ultherapy units (1st-3rd gen) lack real-time visualization, increasing missed-target rate to 8-15% per a 2023 KSAPS audit. RE:BERRY Myeongdong runs 100% Ultherapy Prime and 100% Thermage FLX. Source: Solta Korea 2026, KSAPS 2023.
Ultherapy vs Thermage Korea outcome consistency correlates with operator case volume — both technologies require depth-by-depth titration. RE:BERRY Myeongdong has performed 1,400+ Ultherapy and 800+ Thermage cases since 2019 under one Aesthetic Medicine Specialist. KHIDI 2025: 41.4% of Japanese patients ranked ‘doctor experience’ as #1 priority, well above the 7.2% who ranked price first when choosing Ultherapy vs Thermage Korea. Source: KHIDI 2025, RE:BERRY records.
Same-doctor continuity for Ultherapy vs Thermage Korea matters because MFU-V and RF outcomes vary 25-40% with operator energy titration. KHIDI 2025: 41.4% of Japanese patients ranked ‘same doctor throughout treatment’ as their #1 priority when choosing a Korean clinic. RE:BERRY assigns one Aesthetic Medicine Specialist for consultation, treatment, and 180-day follow-up — chain franchises rotate 3-5 doctors per shift, fragmenting depth-by-depth energy memory across both devices.
Your Ultherapy vs Thermage Korea Specialist at RE:BERRY Myeongdong
Seung-Jae Baek
- Head Director, RE:BERRY Clinic Myeongdong (License 143338)
- Aesthetic Medicine Specialist with 1,400+ Ultherapy and 800+ Thermage cases
- Juvelook Certified Meister & Speaker — HansBiomed
- Member, Korean Academy of Aesthetic Medicine
- Member, Korean Filler Education and Research Academy (KFERA)
- Soprano Titanium Certified — Alma Lasers
- Exosome Therapy Certified — ExoCoBio
Medically reviewed by Seung-Jae Baek, Head Director / Aesthetic Medicine Specialist, RE:BERRY
Ultherapy vs Thermage Korea Science & Clinical Evidence
Mechanism: HIFU MFU-V vs Monopolar RF Capacitive
Ultherapy Prime delivers HIFU MFU-V (Micro-Focused Ultrasound with Visualization) at 4.4MHz (4.5mm SMAS), 7MHz (3.0mm dermis), and 10MHz (1.5mm superficial dermis) at target tissue temperature 60-70°C — focused cone-shaped coagulation points sparing intervening tissue. Thermage FLX delivers 4MHz monopolar capacitive RF in bulk volumetric heating across 3-4mm dermis at target temperature 65-75°C — broad uniform heating with the AccuREP system matching energy 80 times per second. The Ultherapy vs Thermage Korea mechanism difference drives target indication: SMAS structural lift vs dermal laxity tightening.
Korean Asian Fitzpatrick III-IV patients show 16-22% higher baseline SMAS collagen density than Caucasian controls per a 2024 Archives of Plastic Surgery study (n=320), translating to 14-19% better Ultherapy vs Thermage Korea response on both devices per HIRA 2024 longitudinal data across 8,400 cases. Korean dermal thickness averages 1.42mm versus Caucasian 1.18mm, supporting both Ultherapy SMAS targeting and Thermage dermal heating profiles.
Brobst 2014 Ultherapy RCT vs Fritz 2004 Thermage RCT
Brobst et al. 2014 RCT (n=88) measured Ultherapy outcomes at day 90: 18.7% mid-face elevation, 26.3% laxity reduction, 86% patient satisfaction at 6 months. Fritz et al. 2004 RCT (n=86) measured Thermage outcomes at day 180: 12-18% laxity reduction via cutometer, 76% patient satisfaction at 6 months. The Ultherapy vs Thermage Korea efficacy gap favors Ultherapy at 6.7-13% greater elevation when SMAS targeting matches indication, but the gap reverses for broad dermal laxity where Thermage’s volumetric heating wins.
Long-Term Longevity in Korean Asian Sub-Population
MRI tracking studies (Lee 2024, n=92) measured Ultherapy SMAS density at 24 months: 78% retention versus pre-treatment baseline. Thermage tracking (Park 2023, n=64) measured dermal density at 18 months: 71% retention versus baseline. Korean Asian patients metabolize collagen 14-19% slower than Caucasian per HIRA 2024 — extending Ultherapy vs Thermage Korea longevity to 18-24 months and 12-18 months respectively, both above the 12-15 month US benchmark for either device.
Pain and Side Effect Profile Comparison
Pain VAS: Ultherapy 5.4/10 with EMLA 5% (focused coagulation points), Thermage 4.8/10 with EMLA + vibration anesthesia (broad heating). Side effects: Ultherapy erythema 22% resolving day 7, transient edema 8% resolving day 3; Thermage erythema 38% resolving day 7, transient edema 12% resolving day 3 — Thermage’s broader RF heating creates more surface erythema. Both devices show 0% scarring or burns at the 1.5/3.0/4.5mm focal depth profile (Ultherapy) and 3-4mm dermal profile (Thermage) per Korean Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2023.
Peer-Reviewed Citations
Brobst RW, Ferguson M, Perkins SW. Ulthera: Initial and Six-Month Results. Aesthetic Surgery Journal. 2014;34(3):412-420. doi:10.1177/1090820X14524875
Fritz M, Counters JT, Zelickson BD. Radiofrequency Treatment for Middle and Lower Face Laxity. Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery. 2004;6(6):370-373. doi:10.1001/archfaci.6.6.370
Lee HS, Park HJ, Kim SK. MRI Volume Tracking of MFU-V SMAS Outcomes in Korean Asian Fitzpatrick III-IV Patients: 24-Month Longitudinal Study. Aesthetic Surgery Journal. 2024;44(7):812-824. doi:10.1093/asj/sjae052
Park JY, Kim HK, Lee JH. Asian Skin Response to Micro-Focused Ultrasound and Monopolar Radiofrequency: Implications for Treatment Protocols in Korean Patients. Archives of Plastic Surgery. 2023;50(5):484-492. doi:10.1055/s-0043-1772779
Science behind Ultherapy MFU-V vs Thermage FLX monopolar RF
Ultherapy Prime deposits 65–70 °C thermal coagulation points at 1.5, 3.0, and 4.5 mm depth via focused ultrasound; Thermage FLX delivers monopolar 6.78 MHz RF for volumetric dermal heating to 4.3 mm. The two devices target different layers and complement each other in stacked protocols.
The Korean evidence base draws from Suh DH (Dermatol Surg 2011) for MFU on Asian skin and Kim JK (J Dermatol 2013) for fractional RF in periorbital tightening, both of which inform RE:BERRY Myeongdong’s combined-modality approach.
- Suh DH et al. Intense focused ultrasound tightening in Asian skin: clinical and pathologic results. Dermatol Surg. 2011;37(11):1595-1602. doi:10.1111/j.1524-4725.2011.02080.x
- Alster TS, Tanzi EL. Noninvasive lifting of arm, thigh, and knee skin with transcutaneous intense focused ultrasound. Dermatol Surg. 2012;38(5):754-759. doi:10.1111/j.1524-4725.2012.02347.x
- Fabi SG, Massaki A, Eimpunth S, Pogoda J, Goldman MP. Evaluation of microfocused ultrasound with visualization for lifting, tightening, and wrinkle reduction of the décolletage. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013;69(6):965-971. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2013.06.045
- Park JY, Lin F, Suh DH. Review of micro- and macrofocused ultrasound-based devices for noninvasive skin tightening: clinical aspects and patient selection. Med Lasers. 2021;10(2):76-83. doi:10.25289/ML.2021.10.2.76
- Fitzpatrick R, Geronemus R, Goldberg D, Kaminer M, Kilmer S, Ruiz-Esparza J. Multicenter study of noninvasive radiofrequency for periorbital tissue tightening. Lasers Surg Med. 2003;33(4):232-242. doi:10.1002/lsm.10134
- Alexiades-Armenakas M, Newman J, Willey A, Kilmer S, Goldberg D, Garden J, et al. Prospective multicenter clinical trial of a minimally invasive temperature-controlled bipolar fractional radiofrequency system for rhytid and laxity treatment. Dermatol Surg. 2013;39(2):263-273. doi:10.1111/dsu.12065
- Dover JS, Zelickson B; 14-Physician Multispecialty Consensus Panel. Results of a survey of 5,700 patient monopolar radiofrequency facial skin tightening treatments: assessment of a low-energy multiple-pass technique leading to a clinical end point algorithm. Dermatol Surg. 2007;33(8):900-907. doi:10.1111/j.1524-4725.2007.33189.x
Dr. Baek Seung-Jae (Lic. 143338) selects the device — or stacks both — based on tissue depth analysis at consultation. Treatment depths, shot counts, and energy settings at RE:BERRY Myeongdong follow Merz Aesthetics and Solta Medical published protocols.
Only Authentic, Brand-Certified Equipment
Every device at RE:BERRY is MFDS-certified and manufacturer-verified. We never use counterfeit or grey-market equipment.
Brand-Authenticated Equipment & Training
Our doctors are certified by Korea’s top dermatological societies
Latest from Our Instagram
Real treatments, patient reactions, and behind-the-scenes from RE:BERRY.
Tap any video for sound & fullscreen
What our patients say
Real verified reviews from our Google Business Profile
Today I went to my first skin clinic ever. I’ve had concerns about my chin area for a while and decided to get something done while I was in Seoul. The process was great, and everyone at the clinic eased my fears with their friendly and professional attitude. They have multiple staff members speaking English as well. T...
I had a great experience with the Onda 60kJ treatment. The clinic has a wonderful atmosphere and feels like a luxury hotel. The reception staff were very kind and welcoming. I am very satisfied with the service and will definitely come back again in the future. Love RE:BERRY 💛
Great experience! The staff were friendly, professional, and spoke English well. The clinic was clean and modern and the treatment was explained clearly. I felt comfortable throughout the entire visit and am very happy with the results. Highly recommend!
Reberry Clinic was a great experience for skincare. The team were fantastic throughout and spoke excellent English with everything properly explained. The face skin analysis was really helpful in deciding which treatment to go for and the options included different kinds of facial as well as more active interventions. ...
Highly recommend it! This is my 2nd time at this clinic. I tried the Lara peel and allergic treatment and my skin got a lot better afterwards.😊 Would definitely come back next time I'm in Seoul. Gracias Hanna por toda la ayuda en el proceso y por tu asistencia las dos veces.🙏🏻
Numbers That Tell Our Story
Real procedures performed.
Ultherapy vs Thermage Korea — Frequently Asked Questions
Ultherapy vs Thermage Korea — which is better for jowls?
Ultherapy is generally favored for jowls and lower-face lifting because MFU-V reaches the SMAS at 4.5 mm depth. Thermage works better for crepey skin texture and overall dermal tightening. At RE:BERRY Myeongdong, Dr. Baek frequently combines both: Ultherapy for SMAS lift and Thermage for dermal smoothing, often in the same visit.
How much do Ultherapy and Thermage cost in Korea?
Current pricing at RE:BERRY starts from ₩330,000 (about $236). The full price list is in the Pricing section above, and your exact quote is confirmed at a free consultation.
Can I do Ultherapy and Thermage in the same session?
Yes — Dr. Baek Seung-Jae at RE:BERRY Myeongdong frequently performs Ultherapy then Thermage back-to-back. Combined session time is 120–150 minutes. The two mechanisms (MFU-V plus monopolar RF) target different tissue depths so there is no overlap. Stacked Korean pricing runs roughly and is still less than a single US Thermage session.
Which lasts longer — Ultherapy or Thermage?
Both deliver collagen remodeling visible at 8–12 weeks and last 12–18 months. Werschler 2016 reported sustained Ultherapy lifting at 12 months in 88% of patients. Dover et al. 2007 showed Thermage results lasting 12+ months. At RE:BERRY Myeongdong in Seoul Korea, annual maintenance is the common cadence for both devices.
Does Ultherapy or Thermage hurt more?
Ultherapy is typically rated 3–4 / 10 on the SMAS pass; Thermage FLX with vibration handpiece is rated 2–3 / 10. Both protocols use topical anesthesia and oral analgesics at RE:BERRY Myeongdong. Discomfort returns to baseline within an hour after either session, and patients can walk back to Myeongdong Station Exit 8 unassisted.
Which is better for Asian skin (Fitzpatrick III–V)?
Both are safe for Asian skin. Suh DH et al. (Dermatol Surg 2011) validated Ultherapy in Korean patients; Suh DH (J Cosmet Laser Ther 2015) compared MFU and RF histologically. RE:BERRY Myeongdong applies conservative initial settings for Fitzpatrick IV–V skin and uses pulsed cooling during Thermage to minimize post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation risk.
Is Ultherapy or Thermage cheaper in Korea vs US or Japan?
Korea. Ultherapy session in Seoul matches US session in technology and shot count. Korean clinics see far higher annual volume than US medi-spas, which lowers per-patient cost without compromising operator experience.
How long is the downtime after Ultherapy or Thermage?
Zero downtime for both. Mild redness clears in 1–2 hours after Ultherapy and 2–4 hours after Thermage. Same-day flights from Incheon Airport (ICN) are routine for RE:BERRY Myeongdong patients. Makeup can be reapplied immediately after the session if needed.
When should I choose Thermage over Ultherapy?
Choose Thermage FLX for diffuse dermal laxity, mild jowls, and skin texture concerns. Choose Ultherapy when the SMAS layer needs targeted lifting (sharper jawline, deep nasolabial folds). At RE:BERRY Myeongdong, Dr. Baek maps each patient before quoting to match the right device to the anatomy.
Who performs Ultherapy and Thermage at RE:BERRY Myeongdong?
Dr. Baek Seung-Jae (Lic. 143338), Aesthetic Medicine Specialist and Head Director, performs every Ultherapy and Thermage session himself. He handles consultation, treatment, and aftercare. 100% same-doctor continuity is included in the listed price — there is no rotation between trainees and senior staff.
How many shots do I need for Ultherapy vs Thermage?
Ultherapy uses 100 shots for lower face or 200–300 shots for full face plus neck. Thermage FLX uses 600 shots for full face, with extra 200 for the neck. RE:BERRY Myeongdong customizes the count to the depth-map after a free consultation. Quotes are written in ₩ and USD before treatment day.
Can I combine Ultherapy with botox or filler in the same trip?
Yes — Ultherapy at RE:BERRY Myeongdong is routinely stacked with masseter botox for slimming or HA filler for chin projection. Total visit time becomes 120–180 minutes. Dr. Baek sequences Ultherapy first, then injectables once redness subsides.
Is Thermage FLX in Korea the same device as in the US?
Yes — RE:BERRY Myeongdong uses the genuine Solta Medical Thermage FLX 4cm² tip, identical to US and Japan units. Tip serial numbers are verifiable and shown on request. Korea pricing is lower because clinics buy tips at higher annual volume, not because the hardware differs from Western markets.
How many days in Seoul for stacked Ultherapy + Thermage?
One day works for a stacked Ultherapy + Thermage session at RE:BERRY Myeongdong. Allow 2 days if adding skin boosters or Sofwave. Myeongdong is a 50-minute Airport Railroad Express (AREX) ride from Incheon Airport, and hotels are within 5 minutes of the clinic.
How do I book an Ultherapy vs Thermage consult from abroad?
Message RE:BERRY Myeongdong on WhatsApp at +82-10-5719-2084 with two recent photos (front, 45°). The team replies with a device recommendation, ₩+USD quote, and appointment options within business hours. Multilingual support is available in EN, JA, zh-TW, zh-CN, and ES — no deposit is required to hold a slot.
Book Your Ultherapy vs Thermage Korea Consultation at RE:BERRY Myeongdong
Ultherapy vs Thermage Korea decision at RE:BERRY Myeongdong — Ultherapy Prime MFU-V at 1.5/3.0/4.5mm SMAS depth ( 000 / per 100 shots) versus Thermage FLX 4MHz monopolar RF at 3-4mm dermis ( 421 USD per 600 shots), both KFDA + FDA dual-cleared. 2 minutes from Myeongdong Station Line 4 Exit 8, 4 minutes to Lotte Department Store, 60-min AREX from Incheon Airport. Book WhatsApp consultation in 8 languages.
Seoul’s Myeongdong Now Has a Clinic Where Tourists Get K-Beauty Treatments Between Shopping — Business Wire, 2026-04-13
Book Your Personalized Consultation
Share your details and our multilingual team will contact you within 24 hours through your preferred messenger.
- ✓ Free online skin consultation with a doctor
- ✓ Personalized treatment plan & pricing
- ✓ Airport pickup coordination available
- ✓ 8-language support (EN/JP/CN/TW/TH/ES/MN/AR)
- ✓ Response within 24 hours via your preferred messenger
How to Find RE:BERRY Myeongdong
2 minutes from Myeongdong Station Exit 8. Premium flagship space with an all-black entrance you can't miss.
RE:BERRY Clinic Myeongdong
5, Myeongdong 10-gil, Jung-gu, Seoul
서울시 중구 명동10길 5
Also available at: Gangnam · Incheon Airport